Imagine Wall Street as a bustling kitchen, where companies whip up creative recipes to go public. Two dishes have been sizzling lately: reverse mergers vs SPACs.
Both promise a faster track to the stock market, but which one’s the tastier deal for investors?
In this Reverse Merger vs SPAC showdown, we’ll slice through the jargon and walk you through what you need to know as an investor.
Table of Contents
Reverse Merger vs SPAC: What's the Difference?
Wall Street’s menu for going public used to feature one main course: the traditional IPO. But today, reverse mergers and Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) present two alternatives for managers wanting to take their company public.
In a reverse merger, a private company merges with a publicly traded shell, instantly gaining a stock ticker. A SPAC, meanwhile, is a blank-check company that raises cash through an IPO to buy a private firm later. Both skip the long IPO process, but each has its own unique quirks.
Reverse Merger vs SPAC: What is a Reverse Merger?
A reverse merger is when a private company merges with a public shell—a dormant firm already listed on a stock exchange. The shell company almost always lacks an ongoing business or significant assets. Its biggest asset is its stock market listing. The merger results in the private company taking over, inheriting the stock market listing, and voilà—it's trading without the IPO hoopla.
Detailed Explanation of the Reverse Merger Process
Here’s the playbook: First, the private company finds a suitable public shell, often a defunct business with no operations. These are easy to spot, and there are often brokers and specialists working at financial services firms shopping these companies around.
Once the listed company finds a partner they deem suitable. They negotiate a merger, legal filings and shareholder voting follows, then they swap shares so the private firm’s owners control the combined entity, and soon, the stock ticker reflects the new combined company.
Typically a shell company’s shareholders will receive a much smaller portion of the combined company because all they’re really bringing to the table is the stock listing.
Historical Context
Reverse mergers have been around since the 1980s, often a backdoor for smaller firms dodging IPO costs. Think of Burger King’s 2012 revival—it merged with a public shell backed by private equity, sizzling back onto the NYSE.
Other wins include Ted Turner’s media empire, which started via a reverse merger with a billboard company.
These deals happen frequently, often with tiny firms you’ve never heard about, and fortunes can be made in the process.
Reverse Merger vs SPAC: What is a SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company)?
A SPAC is a blank-check company created to raise money through an IPO, then hunt for a private company to acquire. It’s like a cash-stuffed shell with a mission: merge with a target and take it public.
A Look at the SPAC Process
SPACs start with an IPO, selling shares to investors who trust the founders—often seasoned execs—to find a takeover candidate. The cash sits in a trust until they snag a target within (usually) two years. After due diligence and a merger vote, the target goes public under the SPAC’s ticker. It’s a reverse merger with a twist: the shell comes pre-loaded with funds and gets a much larger stake than a reverse merger shell would.
Market Context
SPACs exploded around 2020, with over $80 billion raised in 2021 alone. Chamath Palihapitiya’s SPACs took Virgin Galactic public, while DraftKings scored big via a SPAC deal.
Even Bill Ackman got into the game, launching a SPAC to make key investments during the Covid disaster.
They started off trendy, but the hype’s cooled a lot as performance has varied. As with anything in finance, excess returns are tough to achieve.
Key Differences Between Reverse Mergers and SPACs
Structure and Process Differ Between SPAC and Reverse Merger
Reverse mergers are straightforward: a private firm buys into an existing public shell, often a quiet affair. SPACs flip the script—public first, target later. They’re built from scratch, raising capital before the merger hunt begins.
Timeline and Process Efficiency Can Also Differ Between SPACs and Reverse Mergers
Reverse mergers can close in months, sidestepping IPO roadshows. SPACs take longer—IPOs need time, and the acquisition clock ticks for two years max in many countries. Speed favors reverse mergers; SPACs trade that for structure.
The Regulatory Environment For SPACs and Reverse Mergers
Reverse mergers face lighter SEC scrutiny upfront but must still file post-deal disclosures. SPACs get the full IPO treatment—prospectuses, audits—plus merger filings later. Both dodge traditional IPO rigor, but SPACs wear a tighter regulatory leash.
It’s important to know that both reverse mergers and SPACs can exist in different countries, and each country has its own regulatory environment. Rules that exist in one country will almost certainly differ from rules in another country.
What Costs Are Involved With SPACs and Reverse Mergers?
Reverse mergers lean cheaper, with shell costs ranging from $500,000 to $1 million, plus legal fees. SPACs? Think $10 million-plus for the IPO, underwriter cuts, and more. Cash-rich SPACs cost more to cook.
There’s also the cost of just maintaining the public listing, which can take up to $1 million USD per year, making either the SPAC or Reverse Merger road cost prohibitive for many small firms.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Each
For firms looking to go public, the choice between pursuing a public listing through a SPAC or a reverse merger presents a collection of tradeoffs.
Public Listing Through Reverse Mergers - Pros and Cons
Pros: Speed is king—deals wrap fast. Less regulatory red tape upfront means lower initial costs. Smaller firms love the shortcut.
Cons: Shells can hide skeletons—debts, off balance sheet liabilities, or lawsuits might lurk. Liquidity is often thin, and investor trust can waver without a big marketing push.
Public Listing Through SPACs - Pros and Cons
Pros: Cash floods in from the IPO, fueling growth. SPAC sponsors often bring A-list expertise, boosting credibility—like a master chef’s endorsement.
Cons: Shareholders face dilution when the merger hits. Market swings can tank SPAC stocks, and the two-year deadline adds pressure to find a deal which means the acquirer may be making the move more out of desperation.
Considerations for Investors When Looking at Reverse Mergers vs SPACs
If you’re going to pursue either a SPAC or a Reverse Merger candidate, you really need to keep some key things in mind.
Risk Assessment Is Key For Any Investment
Due diligence is your lifeline. Reverse mergers demand a deep dive into the shell’s past—hidden liabilities can spoil the broth. SPACs need scrutiny on the sponsor’s track record and target quality. Either way, skimping on homework risks a burnt investment.
Market Trends Have an Impact on SPACs
SPACs peaked in 2021 but stumbled as rates rose and flops piled up—think Nikola’s rough ride. Reverse mergers hum along quietly, favored by niche players. Investor sentiment’s split: SPACs dazzle, then disappoint; reverse mergers underwhelm but deliver for some. You need to be very selective, though.
Future Outlook
SPACs might simmer down as regulations tighten and investors tire of volatility. Reverse mergers could rise if small-cap firms seek stealthy listings. Both will stick around—Wall Street loves a creative shortcut—but their flavors may shift with the market’s mood.
Another thing to keep an eye on is what happens with regulation. The SEC has made it tough for investors to buy tiny OTC firms, and the cost of being a public company is just increasing. This may lessen the appeal of reverse mergers, making them increasingly rare.
How Investors Should Approach SPACs vs Reverse Mergers
After all this talk about SPACs and reverse mergers, the success of any investment really just comes down to how attractive the opportunity is that you found. Both SPACs and reverse mergers carry with them their unique mix of risks and possibilities, but at the end of the day it’s really about the investment merits rather than the legal structure of any deal.
If you’re looking for mergers, make sure to sign up for our free special situations newsletter where we share every merger (and other special situations) that we come across once a month.
Read Next:
